Prof. ST Hsieh
Director, US-China Energy Industry Forum
April 29, 2023
Peace making is a good deed, it should be supported earnestly rather than taking cheap shots: “China “doesn’t have much credibility.” NATO is a party of the war in Ukraine but only supports Ukraine without putting any boots on the ground. After more than year of bitter fighting, it is clear that Ukraine does not have the capacity, despite the almost limitless support by the west, to beat Russia. This is why President Zelenskyy told President Xi during the recent phone call that Ukraine welcomes China’s peace actions. It is going to be a very long and challenging process and there is no guarantee of peace. Especially, if the US and NATO do not want peace.
There is also no need to amplify the recent Chinese efforts of peacemaking to “supplanting America on the world stage.” The US absolutely is the greatest global power today and China is a distant second, at least in terms of the military power. But the important question “Is China replacing the U.S. as the world’s peace mediator?”
- How and/or why is the U.S. “losing” the position as the world’s peace mediator? The record shows that the U.S. have started many wars but mediated few peace deals. The unjust war against Iraq, the color revolutions, the war in Afghanistan…just name few! Worse so far, the US had pulled out JCOPA with Iran, the six-party mechanism for de-nuclearization of DPRK. The US has not been a neutral mediator and sanctions many global players.
- On the other hand, PRC’s military adventures are rather limited compared to the US. Further, PRC has no intention of using military power or sanctions as a bargain chip for settling disputes.
- “American and Western officials” instead of “watching China’s efforts closely,” they should stop financing the war. After all, rebuilding Ukraine will be a monumental challenge for the world, and the cost increases day by day.
Is China supplanting America on the world stage?
Joel Mathis, Contributing Writer
Fri, April 28, 2023 at 2:55 AM PDT
Is China replacing the U.S. as the world’s peace mediator? Chinese leader Xi Jinping said Wednesday his country will send an envoy to Ukraine to seek a settlement in the war with Russia, The Associated Press reports. It’s just the latest example of how Xi has “pursued a bigger role in global diplomacy” as part of a campaign to establish China as an even bigger world leader “and to build an international order that favors Beijing’s interests.”
The Ukraine effort comes a month after China brokered a rapprochement between Iran and Saudi Arabia, two longtime rivals in the Middle East. That deal came as a shock to U.S. officials used to having a hand in the region’s affairs. But “all of this comes at a time when the influence of the United States — traditionally the biggest power broker in the Middle East — has waned” in the aftermath of failed wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Al Jazeera reports.
Some observers suggest China’s growing prominence in peace efforts reflects a larger shift in the worldwide balance of power. Thomas Warrick, a former Homeland Security official, tells U.S. News & World Report: “The announcement of China’s involvement in restoring Saudi-Iranian diplomatic ties shows that Middle East diplomacy is alive and well … and does not always go through Washington.”
What are the commentators saying?
“There was a time when all roads to peace went through Washington,” the Quincy Institute’s Trita Parsi writes for the New York Times. That changed as “America’s foreign policy became more militarized” and the United States “gave up on the virtues of honest peacemaking,” frequently taking sides in conflicts instead of acting as a neutral arbiter. The danger now is that the U.S. will see China’s efforts as a threat, instead of welcoming peacemaking efforts. America’s reputation will be in trouble “if we stand in the way of a world where others have a stake in peace.”
“Chinese mediation can benefit the rest of the world too, including the United States,” Robert Rust writes for the Union of Concerned Scientists. Yes, it is difficult to see China as an “impartial actor” in Ukraine, given Xi’s declaration of a “no-limits friendship” on the eve of Russia’s invasion last year. And there are concerns that ending the Russo-Ukraine under Chinese-brokered terms could weaken the democratic world. But if the U.S. wants to retain its influence, it should emphasize cooperation and “work with China to negotiate a peaceful resolution to the conflict.”
America could benefit. “The U.S. has long pressured Beijing to assume” a role as “responsible stakeholder on the international stage,” Ahmed Aboudouh writes for the Atlantic Council. While China’s work on the Iran-Saudi Arabia settlement was clearly part of a push “to reduce U.S. influence on Gulf policies and decision-making, stability in the Persian Gulf also serves U.S. interests. Instead of “deliberately belittling” Chinese diplomacy, the Biden administration “should see China’s mediation as an opportunity, not a threat.”
It’s not just Ukraine. China wants to build on its Iran-Saudi Arabia success by helping bring peace to war-torn Yemen, The Diplomat reports. The Yemeni war is widely seen as a proxy struggle between Iran and Saudi Arabia, which means that “Beijing will be able to take some credit for a possible peace in Yemen” even if China doesn’t play a direct role in achieving a settlement there.
There are always power issues at play. Xi’s efforts to bring about a settlement in Ukraine are probably part of an effort to “undermine a deepening trans-Atlantic solidarity” between the U.S. and Europe that has been bolstered by Russia’s invasion, the Washington Post reports. The effort begins in earnest this weekend when China’s envoy is expected to arrive in Ukraine “where he will work with officials to bring Russia and Ukraine to the negotiating table.”
Will it work? CBS News reports that Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky is cautiously optimistic, calling the visit “an opportunity to use China’s political power to reinforce the principles and rules that peace should be built upon.” Western officials have expressed skepticism, though: NATO secretary general Jens Stoltenberg recently said China “doesn’t have much credibility because they have not been able to condemn the illegal invasion of Ukraine.” One thing is clear: American and Western officials will be watching China’s efforts closely.