Sun. Dec 3rd, 2023

Prof. ST Hsieh

Director, US-China Energy Industry Forum


[email protected]

October 1, 2022

US as the Sheriff of the world after WWII, has sanctioned almost every nation, including a private firm in Israel. It is difficult for the public to keep tracking the progresses of these many sanctions. But we deserve to know how much manpower and annual budget are dedicated to enforcing these sanctions.

Secondly, many sanctions against foreign powers draw direct retaliation. Does the US government have a database for public information?

Thirdly, many financial sanction measures cause collateral domestic damages. In the sense that the US public shoulders part of the cost due to sanctions. Is there anyway to quantify the losses due to sanctions?

Fourth, in general terms, sanctions are not free. Worse, if sanction measures are not well designed or well implemented, they can backfire, these sanctions become unsustainable. A glaring example is European’s seven rounds of “unprecedented” economic and energy sanctions against Russia after the war in Ukraine broke out more than seven months ago. These sanctions did not force an end of the war, rather they have caused a broad energy crisis in Europe. Worst yet, Europe’s energy crisis has morphed to an economic crisis. The resultant recessions will have global impact. Winter weather will be in Europe soon, social unrests are emerging that could cause political instabilities and change of governments.

We wish the Biden Administration can explain, not only to US senators but also to the general public, why Russian sanctions haven’t had more impact. Further, the so called “Russian sanctions” are jointly implemented with European partners, so a complete review of the effectiveness should include European inputs.

After all, US and her allies should elaborate a plan or strategy of how to end the war in Ukraine and a vison for the post war Europe. The high risk is that if new sanctions become so effective that Russia is completely chocked, Putin may push the “nuclear button,” then what?

‘Got to get this right’: Senators press administration why Russian sanctions haven’t had more impact

Maureen Groppe, USA TODAY Thu, September 29, 2022 at 12:47 PM

WASHINGTON – Unprecedented sanctions against Russia for its invasion of Ukraine have wounded – but not crippled – the country, prompting bipartisan frustration in Congress that they haven’t packed a bigger punch.

Pressed on that issue at a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing Wednesday, Biden administration officials urged lawmakers to give the sanctions more time while also promising additional actions are in the works.

The latest

  • Massive sanctions: Since the February invasion of Ukraine, nearly 40 countries have imposed economics costs on Russia. Financial institutions have been sanctioned. More than 1,000 Russians have seen their assets frozen abroad. And more than 1,000 companies have stopped operating in Russia, according to New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez, the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
  • Biggest ever: The sanctions program is the largest the U.S. has undertaken, along with allies, in scope and scale, according to Elizabeth Rosenberg, assistant secretary for terrorist financing and financial crimes at the Treasury Department.
  • Ruble rebounds: Despite the economic penalties, Russia’s ruble has bounced back and is stronger than it was before the invasion.
  • Putin scoffs: Russian President Vladimir Putin has mocked the sanctions campaign and dismissed as “stupid” a Western attempt to cap prices on Russian oil and gas.

Taking the long view

Biden administration officials said steps Russia has taken to counter the sanctions are not sustainable. Russia is running through its budget surplus and will have a deficit by the end of the year, according to Rosenberg. The administration projects that by 2030, Russia’s economy will be 20% smaller than it would’ve been without the sanctions.

Harder to measure are the impacts of the “friction and uncertainty” caused by export controls and restrictions on financing the military equipment and other goods Russians need.

At some point, the system becomes so rickety and improvised, that it can’t succeed,” said James O’Brien, head of the State Department’s sanctions coordination office.

What’s about to happen

Because Russia’s primary source of hard currency is oil and gas exports, the United States is working with other G7 nations on a price-capping mechanism they hope to have in place by early December. Rosenberg said the price cap has already forced Russia to negotiate steep discounts for oil it’s selling to Asian countries.

Other actions the administration is taking, she said, including going after the “broader networks of facilitators” Russia is using to buy weapons and technology. The administration also wants to plug “gaps” in sanctions in areas where some allies haven’t gone as far as the U.S. has.

Top takeaways

While senators recognized the enormous effort going into the sanctions, both Democrats and Republicans said the impact hasn’t been as great as they expected.

Figuring out why that is, and what more can be done, is important not just to help end the war in Ukraine. Lawmakers are also concerned about what lessons other countries with military ambitions – particularly China – will take away.

“We’ve got to get this right. China is watching and learning from our every move,” said Idaho Sen. James Risch, the top Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

What they are saying

  • “We have had an impact, but it’s not quite what we thought,” Menendez said.
  • “There will be more packages. We are working on more sanctions,” O’Brien said.
  • “We have to have a more clear assessment in Congress’s mind and our national psyche as to just what the impact of sanctions can do,” said Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah.
  • “We were told these were going to be the toughest sanctions ever on a country and they were going to have certain impacts, and we have not seen the full impact that was described to us,” said Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H.
  • “If we get this wrong, we risk not only billions of dollars in U.S. and allied economic hardships, we’ll also risk providing Russia with the means to completely insulate itself from future sanctions actions and continue its brutal war in Ukraine,” Risch said.

Reaction to annexation

The administration could announce additional sanctions after Russia officially annexes four regions of Ukraine that were forced into sham elections.

Separately, Sens. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina introduced legislation Thursday to cut off economic or military aid to any nation that recognizes the annexation.

The bipartisan duo said they would try to pass the legislation either on its own or as an amendment to the annual Pentagon policy bill that the Senate may vote on in October.

Why? Because they make no sense! They are nearly perfect sanctions if your object was to bankrupt the EU….(maybe it was)….

the us would have to sanction itself, we are still buying fertilizers and uranium from russia and many other things not reported, china would not be bullied by us with sanctions that can only be done to the us colonies in europe and aisa

U.S. imposes new sanctions on Iran oil exports, targets Chinese firms

FILE PHOTO: Illustration shows Iran’s and U.S.’ flags

Daphne Psaledakis

Thu, September 29, 2022 at 10:14 AM

By user

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.